To solve the riddle of Nick Land's ontology I invite our lovely pal امیر دالپوضک to become an admin. The floor is yours Amir(احتمالا الان خوابه):

Diogenes raises a hotdog and yells "Behold a man".

Ok maybe not "damn". This is the kind of stuff I used to write during my emo phase when I was a teen.

What if - instead of 'How Do You Make Yourself A Body Without Organs?' - one were to ask: How do you make yourself a Nazi? For this is far more strenuous than the 1980 diagnosis suggests.

1) Wherever there is impersonality and chance, intro­duce conspiracy, lucidity, and malice. Look for enemies everywhere, ensuring that they are such that one than simultaneously envy and condemn them. Proliferate new subjectivities; racial subjects, national subjects, elites, secret societies, destinies.

2) Burn Freud, and take desire back to the Kantian con­ception of will. Wherever there is impulse represent it as choice, decision, the whole theatrical drama of volition. Introduce a gloomy atmosphere of oppressive responsi­bility by couching all discourses in the imperative form.

3) Revere the principle of the great individual. Personal­ize and mythicize historical processes. Love obedience above all things, and enthuse only for signs; the name of the leader, the symbol of the movement, and the icons of molar identity.

4) Foster nostalgia for what is maximally bovine, inflex­ible, and stagnant: a line of racially pure peasants digging the same patch of earth for eternity.

5) Above all, resent everything impetuous and irrespon­sible, insist upon unrelenting vigilance, crush sexual­ity under its reproductive function, rigidly enforce the domestication of women, distrust art, classicize cities to eliminate the disorder of uncontrolled flows, and perse­cute all minorities exhibiting a nomadic tendency.

Trying not to be a Nazi approximates one to Nazism far more radically than any irresponsible impatience in destratification. Nazism might even be characterized as the pure politics of effort; the absolute dominion of the collective super-ego in its annihilating rigor. Nothing could be more politically disastrous than the launching of a moral case against Nazism: Nazism is morality itself, heir to Europe's respectable history: that of witch-burnings, inquisitions, and pogroms. To want to be in the right is the common substratum of morality and genocidal reaction; the same desire for repression - organized in terms of the disapproving gaze of the father - that Anti-Oedipus analyzes with such power. Who could imagine Nazism without daddy? And who could imagine daddy being pre-figured in the energetic unconscious?

Nick Land, Making it with Death

من کچلم تو لوله‌کش من آگاهی طبقاتی دارم و برای رعایت شدن حقوق تو تلاش می‌کنم و امیدوارم که در تنش طبقاتی، پرولتاریا نقش انقلابی خود را گسترش دهد که لازمه آن ایجاد آگاهی در بین کارگران اقشار مختلف است. بدیهی است که لازمه چنین هدفی، تابوزدایی از شغل‌های گوناگون…

من کچلم تو لوله‌کش
من آگاهی طبقاتی دارم و برای رعایت شدن حقوق تو تلاش می‌کنم و امیدوارم که در تنش طبقاتی، پرولتاریا نقش انقلابی خود را گسترش دهد که لازمه آن ایجاد آگاهی در بین کارگران اقشار مختلف است. بدیهی است که لازمه چنین هدفی، تابوزدایی از شغل‌های گوناگون است؛ خصوصا شغل لوله‌کشی که کارگران آن از کارگران اساسی یک جامعه به حساب می‌آیند و بدون آن‌ها (به معنای واقعی کلمه) گند همه چیز در می‌آید...
THAT BEING SAID:
بو بکش

I don't endorse Jorjani in any way politically (specially since my views could be classified as "Leftist"). As I said before he's deranged. Despite that I find merits and good points when he talks about technology, history of philosophy and mythology.