This is the chart that you need before talking with a pediatrician.

Vaccine injury lawyer Aaron Siri acting at the behest of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has produced a remarkable chart. It lists every vaccine on the childhood schedule, how many doses are recommended, what age children are injected with it, the brand, who manufactures it, whether the clinical trial for this vaccine used a placebo, and how long the clinical trial lasted. And what the chart shows is that none of the vaccines on the childhood schedule were tested against an inert saline placebo and none of the trials were long enough to accurately measure harms. Therefore, a true risk versus benefit assessment cannot be made.

This chart illustrates that the CDC Child and Adolescent Vaccine Schedule is the most horrifying example of regulatory capture in history.

https://openvaers.com/component/acym/archive/66-icans-no-placebo-chart

What was publicized as the biggest scoop in the leaked #RKIFiles is an anachronism that raises questions about legitimacy. Could the documents have been faked by the institute?

https://pandata.org/are-the-leaked-robert-koch-institute-files-forgeries/

PANDA

Are the leaked Robert Koch Institute files forgeries? - PANDA

The minutes don't seem to add up

"We are now reaping the harvest of untruth...Power has displaced integrity."

An excellent call by David Bell to take a stand.

https://brownstone.org/articles/we-reap-the-harvest-of-lies/

On the withdrawal of the AZ injection:

"AstraZeneca did not make billions. It sold 'at cost' and its product was de facto pulled from EU market already in early 2021.

BioNTech, the German company which is the actual authorization holder for the Pfizer jab, sold at 10x the AZ price and made over €30 billion.

The EU gave the BioNTech-Pfizer consortium a de facto monopoly. BioNTech was heavily subsidized and promoted by the German government." ~ Robert K

Universities Alliance South Africa vs University of the Free State - judgment
UA has received judgment in its legal challenge against the UFS' mandatory vaccination policy.

Ultimately, although the judges acknowledged the strength of UA's case, they were unwilling to rule on the policy's lawfulness either way, claiming instead that the policy and its consequences were historical and of no current importance.

For full context, it is highly recommended that you read the attached documents and view the hearing alongside our update letter.

Our update letter and the judgment have been combined into 1 document (attached) for ease of sharing.

Link to streams of hearing

(there are 2 separate videos since the stream was reported and taken down midway):

https://www.youtube.com/@UniversitiesAllianceSA/streams