The Gympie, Queensland, Australia pyramid.

The site is closed off by the Australian government as "native private property".

26.1690°S 152.6930°E 63 Gympie Connection Rd, Victory Heights QLD 4570, Australia

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

ᴬᴬ Definitely not Atlantis, but nonetheless calls into question the official timeline of human development.

"Found in 2001 by a company doing surveying work, the sonar images have shown symmetrical and geometric structures that covers an area of 200 ha (almost 2 square km) at depths between 2,000 and 2,460 feet (± 700 m). Skeptics believe the site is too deep to be manmade as it is estimated that it would have taken the structures 50,000 years to sink to their current depth. If conclusive proof can be found that these structures were indeed manmade, it would back up the Maya and local Yucatecos stories of an ancient island inhabited by their ancestors that vanished beneath the sea"

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

Indo-Aryan Cognates:

Based on the "you eat meat" list, adapted to "you mouth hunt" for a morphological point of view to corroborate a semantic sense.

English: You mouth hunt
Sanskrit: ????? ?????? ????? (tvám māṃsám khādasi)
Hindi: तू मांस खाता है (tū māns khātā hai)
Bengali: তুমি মাংস খাও (tumi mangsho khao)
Gujarati: તે માંસ ખાય છે (tē mānsa khāya chē)
Marathi: तो मांस खातो (tō mānsa khātō)
Nepali: तँ मासु खान्छस् (tã māsu kānchas)
Sinhalese: ඔහු මස් කනවා (ohu mas kanavā)

ᶜᴸ Here is the actual Vulgate, don't touch the current Nova Vulgata corrupted version with a 10 foot barge pole.

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

History of the Codex Amiatinus:

Originally three copies of the Bible were commissioned by Abbot Ceolfrid in 692. This date has been established as the double monastery of Monkwearmouth–Jarrow secured a grant of additional land to raise the 2,000 head of cattle needed to produce the vellum. Bede was most likely involved in the compilation. In 716, Ceolfrid accompanied one copy, the Codex Amiatinus, intended as a gift to Pope Gregory II, but he died en route to Rome on 29 September 716 at Langres, Burgundy. The book later appears in the 9th century in Abbey of the Saviour, Mount Amiata in Tuscany (hence the description "Amiatinus"), where it is recorded in a list of the Abbey's relics dated 1036, describing it as being an Old and New Testament 'written in the hand of the blessed Pope Gregory'. It remained in the San Salvatore Monastery until 1786 when it passed to the Laurentian Library in Florence. The dedication page had been altered and the principal librarian to the Laurentian, Angelo Maria Bandini suggested that the author was Servandus, a follower of St. Benedict, and that it had been produced at Monte Cassino around the 540s. This claim was accepted for the next hundred years, establishing it as the oldest copy of the Vulgate, but scholars in Germany noted the similarity to 9th-century texts. In 1888, Giovanni Battista de Rossi established that the Codex was related to the Bibles mentioned by Bede. This also established that Amiatinus was related to the Greenleaf Bible fragment in the British Library. Although de Rossi's attribution removed 150 years from the age of the Codex, it remains the oldest version of the Vulgate *and the oldest complete Christian bible in any language.**

As the primary source of the Vulgate, the manuscript was of particular importance to the Catholics during the Counter-Reformation. Protestant translations derived from the original language of the Scriptures, but the Latin text of the Amiatinus was earlier than any then-known Hebrew manuscript, making it a "major piece of propaganda in the battle for textual precedence". In 1587 Pope Sixtus V demanded the book be sent to Rome where it was consulted for a new papal edition of the Bible, the Sixtine Vulgate; although in the event, little or no use was made of its readings in either the Sistine or subsequent Sixto-Clementine official Vulgate editions, whose editors rather preferred later medieval Vulgate texts and editions now known to have been heavily corrupted by non-Vulgate readings.

In view of the many accumulated corruptions in all published editions of the Vulgate so far, the Oxford University Press accepted in 1878 a proposal from classicist John Wordsworth (later Bishop of Salisbury) to produce a new critical edition of the Vulgate New Testament. This was eventually published as Nouum Testamentum Domini nostri Iesu Christi Latine, secundum editionem sancti Hieronymi in three volumes between 1889 and 1954; the Codex Amiatinus being a primary source for the entire text; which also followed this manuscript in presenting the text in sense lines, cola et commata without any other indication of punctuation. In 1907 Pope Pius X commissioned the Benedictine monks in Rome to prepare a critical edition of Jerome's Vulgate, entitled Biblia Sacra iuxta latinam vulgatam versionem, which eventually emerged as a counterpart Old Testament to the Oxford New Testament, following largely the same critical principles, and according similar primary status to the Codex Amiatinus text (other than for the Psalms); and similarly deriving its layout, cola et commata from Amiatinus.*

ᶜᴸ Spread of the Proto-Indo-European word for Brother.

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

ᶜᴸ Refutation of the 'Curse of Ham' and the Black Race:

In Genesis 9, it is said that "Noah... was drunken... and uncovered... and Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren... [they] covered the nakedness of his father..... and Noah awoke... and knew what his younger son had done unto him... and said cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren... God shall... dwell in the tents of Shem, and Canaan shall be his servant."

This story presents a very simple scenario - Ham sees the nakedness of his father Noah and does nothing to help nor look away, and so Noah curses Ham's son Canaan to be a servant for this act, specifically to Shem. Of course this nakedness might be some greater metaphor, but that will not be discussed here.

Two things must be noted - only Canaan was cursed, and no one else was cursed.

This entire passage only covers 8 verses, and could not be more clear or concise in its result- that Canaan must be subjugated by Shem - which is what happened when the sons of Shem i.e. the Israelites came forth from Egypt and conquered Canaan and subjugaed the native Canaanites.

But this passage has been purposely misconstrued to produce a meaning that makes no sense by any reading of the text - that God punished Ham and his children with dark skin, and this is where the Black race comes from.

This 'intepretation' cannot be informed from the original text, so where does it originate?

It does not in fact originate in any Christian work, but instead the Jewish Talmud. Specifically, Sanhedrin 108b of the Babylonian Talmud states that "Ham, son of Noah... engaged in intercourse while in the ark... and Ham was afflicted in that his skin turned black."

This tractate is from the Mishna, and so dates to around the 3rd century AD and was primarily based on Pharisee Oral Law.

Thus this belief is not Christian, and is in fact a Talmudic Judaic Pharisee belief that is not found in the Bible, nor would any reading of the Bible be able to create this intepretation.

This is amplified by the fact Canaanites were never black, so blackness can in no way be the implication - and of the sons of Ham, only one could be considered Black; Cush i.e. Nubia. The rest, Egypt (Mizraim) and Phœnicia (Put), were not in any way black.

Thus for this curse to explain the origin of Blacks, it would mean that somehow Palestine and Lebanon are the source of the black race and that they migrated to Sub-Sahara Africa. This assertion is of course refuted by all scientific, linguistic, and archeological evidence, as well as common sense.

This Talmudic belief appears to have only entered Christianity in the 15th century through Doninican friar Annius of Viterbo, who is now infamous for being a fraud who claimed to speak Etruscan, and also buried objects to later claim to have found them so he could claim to be an archeologist.

The belief only became widespread in the English and American world in the 17th and 18th century to justify slavery, but even then many theologians disproved it through common sense - with the belief only survivng, even to today, through ignorance.

ᶜᴸ Mesha Stele Inscription:
The first recorded use of the name of the God of Abraham (יהוה YHWH) is found in the 9th century BC Mesha Stele.
This text which is written in Moabite (a dialect of Canaanite, and in the Phoenician script) tells the Biblical story from the Second Book of Kings (chapter 3) from the perspective of the Moabites instead of the Isrælites.

????
The full text can be found here.

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

White Excellence:
Debunking the myth of Jewish and Asian IQ.

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

ᶜᴸ Romance Languages: Pronunciation of Vulgar Latin & Romance

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2