Review of crtz.top @crtzapi @icmpflood ⁉️

Layer 4: Rating: 9/10 ?
it's clear that this API performs exceptionally well for game servers. The UDP methods bypass a significant amount of protections, though the exact Gbps output isn't specified. If you're looking for an affordable API or C2 solution, this is one of the best options available—offering 4 concurrents for just $70, which is incredible value.

Layer 7: Rating: 7.5/10 ?
The Layer 7 methods are solid, bypassing Cloudflare (CF) effectively. I haven’t had the chance to test them extensively, so this rating might change later. The HTTPXV method is both reliable and effective.

Overall: ?
The only downside is some occasional lag with the CNC, but the overall performance and power make up for it. It’s a reliable and potent option, and I highly recommend it.

For more details or to rate your service, feel free to DM @synrape.
Owner: @Ryonosss

Announcement:
We are active again, if I did not respond to you previously, please send your message, to get a rating of your service dm @synrape

Announcement ❗️:

Censored, the main owner of Cypher Botnet has been banned from Telegram. Despite some rumors circulating, rest assured that this is not a scam. We appreciate your continued support. You can find the new channel here :

@cypherbotnett

@BlessedC2 ?
Rating ?: 7/10
Layer7 ?: (+2.25)
Its good , but the only bad thing about it is that the browser method is kinda not working and the RPS isnt that high
Layer4: (+3.5)
Its very good , some methods have high Traffic count , and other methods for bypass.
Stability Of power (+1) ?

Contact @rayen987

@BlessedC2 ?
评分?：7/10
Layer7 ?：（+2.25）
很好，但唯一不好的是浏览器方法不太管用，RPS 也不高
Layer4 ?：（+3.5）
非常好，有些方法流量大，其他方法可以绕过。
电源稳定性（+1）?

Contact : @rayen987

@axiomapi

Rating: 7/10 ☠️

L 7️⃣: the layer7 is the best thing in it , good and high requests per second,good methods , and they using as they said ,
100% own power.
L 4 : ?‍♂️

@axiomapi

等级： 7/10 ☠️

7️L⃣：layer7是其中最好的东西，每秒请求量好，请求量高，方法好，他们如他们所说使用，100%自有力量。
L 4 ： ? ♂️

@fragment_api Rating *☠️*:7.25/10
{*⚠️*This Test hasnt counted CloudFlare because of the latest updates}

L7 ?****: The layer7 is good , killing almost every target such as DDoS Guard and other protections, The power is good and bypass is good , but CF wasnt counted because of the latest updates.

L4 ⭕️*: The layer4 is very good , with UDP every attack makes 50G , good methods and good power.*@fragment_api
评分☠️：7.25/10
{⚠️**由于最新更新，此测试未计算 CF}

L7 ?：layer7 很好，几乎可以杀死所有目标，例如 DDoS Guard 和其他防护，威力很好，旁路也很好，但由于最新更新，CF 没有被计算在内。

L4*⭕️***：layer4非常好，使用UDP每次攻击50G，方法好，威力大。

cfxsecurity.cc

Rating: 3️⃣.7️⃣5️⃣/1️⃣0️⃣

L4: Even though the DNS method is pushing 15G , the other methods are not good at all , the bypass methods are bad and only TCP-OVH seems to work

L7: L7 does work , but it only makes small RPS like 40K RPS , someone can do it better using his owner server and a leaked method.

cfxsecurity.cc
3️⃣.7️⃣5️⃣/1️⃣0️⃣
L4：虽然DNS方法推15G，但其他方法一点都不好，旁路方法很糟糕，只有TCP-OVH似乎有效

L7：L7确实有效，但它只能产生像40K RPS这样的小RPS，有人可以使用他的所有者服务器和泄露的方法做得更好。

@chunkypublic
Rating: 6.8
L7 : Layer 7. 8/10 very good layer 7 achieves very good results for ddosguard/cf, it also manages to down most pages very good, I recommend it.
L4 : layer 4. 5/10 udp power reaches 30-50 Gbps but ovh methods are very good, I think they are the best I have tested so far

@chunkypublic
评分：6.8
L7：第 7 层。8/10 非常好 第 7 层为 ddos​​guard/cf 取得了非常好的结果，它还成功地成功地关闭了大多数页面，我推荐它。
L4 : 第 4 层。5/10 udp 功率达到 30-50 Gbps，但 ovh 方法非常好，我认为它们是迄今为止我测试过的最好的方法

a note from me: from what I found out, the owner lost a lot of the server, so the power is worse, but there is one minus - my slots are always full, and there are few of them, only 4 slots and a lot of people use them, so the slots are constantly occupied and that is a problem .

@intensesecurity
Rating: 5
L7 : Layer 7 is quite good, works well with ddosguard and firewall.
L4 : dns generates easily 80 Gbp/s udpraw generates 70 Gbp/s 1 conc methods generally work but not many slots because udpraw only has 3 slots from what the owner told me.

@intensesecurity
评分：5
L7：第 7 层非常好，与 ddos​​guard 和防火墙配合良好。
L4 : dns 轻松生成 80 Gbp/s udpraw 生成 70 Gbp/s 1 conc 方法通常可以工作，但插槽不多，因为根据所有者告诉我的，udpraw 只有 3 个插槽。

a note from me: Generally, the owner is a bit of a strange person because I record every test and if someone wants to see it, dm @cattypog, I show it to him and tell him that his power is recorded and he tells me that it's strange that he expects him to achieve something, I judge him based on my results and not that someone tells me it had 300 Gb/s, I judge by what I see at a given moment, not by what it used to be

@coldc2
Rating: 8️⃣
1️⃣L7 : Layer 7 is good, easily reaches 200k+ rq on nosec2, same stable and power is good.
2️⃣L4 : Layer 4 with udp reaches 400 gbps easily, ovh is also not that bad, other methods are also very good, they have good bypass, so if you are looking for a good botnet, it seems to be good to me.

@coldc2
评分：8️⃣
1️⃣L7：第 7 层很好，在 nosec2 上轻松达到 200k+ rq，同样稳定且功率良好。
2️⃣L4 :使用udp的第4层很容易达到400 Gbps，ovh也不错，其他方法也很好，它们有很好的旁路，所以如果你正在寻找一个好的僵尸网络，这对我来说似乎很好

*⚠️*a note from me: This is information from me that I wrote with the owner and it is not his power, he has an API from a good person, if the owner also seems honest, if he has money to maintain this power, the botnet will be very good because the power is really good but it is not his I wanted to write this To be honest with the people who buy it, it's funnel, but it's a very good one, it just needs to maintain its power.