In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner says: Is spending generously on one’s family and children on the day of ‘Aashuraa from the heresies?

? The answer:

Yes, it’s apparent that it is from the heresies. The Prophet (ﷺ) and his companions didn’t do it. It is not a day of ‘Eid rather, only the Jews took this day as a festive day. Hence, it will be imitating the Jews, as they are the ones who do this. And as for us, then we worship Allah by fasting these two days, the ninth and the tenth. As for increasing in generosity when it comes to food, drink and purchasing sweets, then this is from the heresies, and in it is an imitation of the Jews, thus it is obligatory to stay clear from such actions.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/14897

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_fasting
#Fatwas_on_supererogatory_fasts
#Fatwas_on_fasting_on_prohibited_days
#Fatwas_on_fasting_on_ashura
-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بسم اللــــه الرحمـــــــــن الرحيم ***📩*** الســـــــــــــؤال :- يقول السائل: هل التوسيع على الأهل والأولاد يوم عاشوراء من البدع؟ ***📝*** الإجــــــــــــابة :- نعم يظهر أنه من البدع فلم يفعله النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وأصحابه، وليس يوم عيد إنما يتخذه اليهود عيداً،…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner says: Is there any evidence that the Prophet (ﷺ) habitually fasted the day of ‘Aashuraa from the time he entered Madinah?

? The answer:

He (ﷺ) fasted it before the migration, for it has come in the hadith of ‘A'ishah (رضي الله عنها) whereby she said:
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﺗﺼﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭاء ﻓﻲ اﻟﺠﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ، ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺼﻮﻣﻪ، ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻫﺎﺟﺮ ﺇﻟﻰ اﻟﻤﺪﻳﻨﺔ، ﺻﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺼﻴﺎﻣﻪ، ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ: (ﻣﻦ ﺷﺎء ﺻﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺎء ﺗﺮﻛﻪ)
“Quraysh used to fast the day of ‘Aashuraa in the time of pre-islamic ignorance, and the Prophet (ﷺ) used to fast it. When he migrated to Madinah, he fasted it and he commanded it to be fasted. When the fasting of Ramadan was obligated, he said:
“The one who wishes to can fast it, and the one who wants to can leave it”
[Agreed upon]
So the obligation of fasting it was abrogated and it became recommended.

The Prophet (ﷺ) fasted it from the time he migrated to Madinah, and he continued to fast it until Allah took his soul. He habitually fasted this day, rather he commanded with fasting it as you heard, in the beginning of the migration, a command that necessitates obligation. Then when the fasting of Ramadan was obligated, the ruling of fasting on ‘Aashuraa was abrogated from obligatory to recommended, and the Prophet (ﷺ) still continued to fast it habitually.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/14901

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_fasting
#Fatwas_on_supererogatory_fasts
#Fatwas_on_fasting_on_prohibited_days
#Fatwas_on_fasting_on_ashura
-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بسم اللــــه الرحمـــــــــن الرحيم ***📩*** الســـــــــــــؤال :- يقول السائل: هل يوجد دليل أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم داوم على صيام عاشوراء من حين قدم المدينة ؟ ***📝***الإجــــــــــــــــابة :- قد صامه صلى الله عليه وسلم من قبل الهجرة ففي حديث ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ اﻟﻠﻪ…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner says: With regards to the fast of ‘Aashuraa, should one fast on the eleventh day after the tenth, if they didn’t fast on the ninth?

? The answer:

When the Prophet (ﷺ) fasted the day of ‘Aashuraa, and it was said to him:
"إن اليهود تصومه يارسول الله"
“Verily the Jews fast this day, O Messenger of Allah”.
He said:
(لَئِنْ بَقِيتُ إِلَى قَابِلٍ لأَصُومَنَّ التَّاسِعَ)
"If I live till the next (year), I would definitely observe fast on the ninth."
And he did not fast the eleventh (ﷺ).

Hence, that which is apparent is that the eleventh day is not to be fasted. Rather, if one is able to fast the ninth with the tenth, then they should do so, and if one didn’t fast the ninth, then he suffices with the tenth only. For verily the Prophet (ﷺ) sufficed with fasting the tenth only.

As for the hadith of ibn ‘Abbaas reported by Ahmad which states:
"صوموا يوماً قبله أو يوماً بعده"
“Fast a day before it, or a day after it”.
Then it is a weak hadith which is not established. Rather it is authentically established from ibn ‘Abbaas himself, with an authentic chain of transmission, in ibn Abi Shaybah, that he said:
"صوموا التاسع والعاشر وخالفوا اليهود"
“Fast the ninth and the tenth, oppose the Jews!”

So he commanded with fasting the ninth, and he didn’t command with fasting the eleventh.

And all aid and assistance is sought from Allah alone.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/14891

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_fasting
#Fatwas_on_supererogatory_fasts
#Fatwas_on_fasting_on_prohibited_days
#Fatwas_on_fasting_on_ashura
-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بسم اللــــه الرحمـــــــــن الرحيم ***📩*** الســـــــــــؤال :- يقول السائل :في صيام عاشوراء هل يصام الحادي عشر بعد العاشر إذا لم يصم التاسع ؟ ***📝*** الإجـــــــــابة :- النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لما صام العاشر وقيل له: إن اليهود تصومه يارسول الله قال: لئن بقيت…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner asks: What is the ruling of standing up for someone who has come from a journey or other than a journey?

? The answer:

If he has come, regardless of it being from a journey or other than a journey, and he stood up in order to shake his hand or hug him, then there is no problem. The standing up is not for the man himself rather the standing up is for the greeting or the hugging, hence this is permissible and there is no issue.

It has been authentically established on the authority of Hasan al-Basri with al-Bayhaqi with an authentic chain of transmission, and it has come on the authority of Anas with Al-Tabrani with a chain of transmission which is acceptable that they both said:
(كان أصحاب النبي ﷺ إذا التقوا تصافحوا، وإذا قدِموا من سفر تعانقوا)
“The companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) would shake hands if they met, and when they would return from a journey they would hug”

So a standing person hugging a seated person is not something which is ordinary, and it also leads to the standing person needing to bow down, so that which is best is for him to stand, and there is no issue with this standing as it is not a standing in order to venerate the man and neither for the purpose of worship. Not the standing of worship, nor the standing of veneration rather it is standing for another purpose.

As the Prophet (ﷺ) said as has come in the Saheehayn on the authority of ‘A’ishah (رضي الله عنها):
(لما جاء سعد بن معاذ رضي الله عنه، قال: "قُومُوا إِلَى سَيِّدِكُمْ)
“When Sa’d bin Mu’aadh (رضي الله عنه) came he said: “stand up for your chief”
i.e. to lower him from his donkey, because he was injured and so that they can receive him.

Also in the Saheehayn when K’ab bin Malik (رضي الله عنه) repented when Allah revealed with regards to his repentance, Talha bin ‘Ubaydullah (رضي الله عنه) stood up to run towards him. He (Ka’b) said: “until he shook my hand and congratulated me.” He stood and ran towards him and so Ka’b never forgot this gesture from Talha.

This standing is for incidental matters, not for venerating him. As for standing in order to venerate the person then this is impermissible. It has come in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad on the authority of Mu’aawiyah bin Abi Sufyaan (رضي الله عنه) that the Prophet ﷺ said:
(مَنْ أَحَبَّ أَنْ يَمْثُلَ لَهُ عِبَادُ اللَّهِ قِيَامًا، فَلْيَتَبَوَّأْ مَقْعَدَهُ مِنَ النَّارِ)
“Let him who likes people to stand up before him prepare his place in Hell.”
i.e. a man being venerated, and he desires from the people to stand up for his coming, this is Haram, and due to this it has come in the Sunan of Abu Dawud on the authority of Anas (رضي الله عنه) who said:
ما كان أحد أحبَ إليهم، من رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، وكانوا لا يقومون له، لما يعلمون من كراهيته لذلك.
“There was no person more beloved to them than the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), and they would not stand when they saw him because they knew that he disliked that."
i.e. the standing of veneration as is done by the disbelievers for their kings whereby they rise up and stand erected in front of him.

Hence, standing for an incidental purpose is ok, whilst standing in order to venerate the person is Haram. Furthermore, that which they do in schools whereby they make them stand up for the teacher when he enters by way of veneration, then this also is included in the Haram. As for standing for the purpose of exercise as is done in the school playgrounds, then this is allowed and prescribed, and as for remaining still which they call ‘waqfatu ‘alam’ standing still for the flag, then this is impermissible and it is an imitation of the enemies of Islam.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/16285

#Fatwas_on_adab_ettiquetes
#Fatwas_on_general_and_specific_matters
-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بِسْمِ اللّــــهِ الرَّحْمَـــــــــنِ الرَّحِيمِ ***📩*** السُــــــــــــؤالُ :- يقول الأخ السائل: ما حكم القيام لشخص قدم من سفر أو غير سفر؟ ***📝*** الإجـــــــــــابة :- إن كان قدم، سواء من سفر أو من غير سفر، وقام من أجل أن يصافحه أو يعانقه، فلا بأس، فليس قيامًا…

As the person said: 'Looking followed with smiling and greeting… speaking followed by setting a date and then meeting.'
These are all Fitan (plural of Fitnah) which have become widespread amongst the Muslims, and there is no might and no power except by Allah.

It is obligatory upon the guardians of the women to have Taqwa of Allah with regards to their womenfolk, and to not allow his daughter and neither his sister to free-mix with men, and it is obligatory upon him to have Taqwa of Allah.
﴿يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا قُوا أَنْفُسَكُمْ وَأَهْلِيكُمْ نَارًا وَقُودُهَا النَّاسُ وَالْحِجَارَةُ﴾.
“O you who believe! Ward off yourselves and your families against a Fire (Hell) whose fuel is men and stones”

And how many men left their daughters, and allowed for her to have her freedom, and before he knew it after that he was trialled with his reputation being tarnished, and trialled with his close ones falling into Zina, and then after that from them is the one who wants to murder, and one that wants to disown, and the likes of this.

So this is from the Fitan that the enemies of Islam are striving towards to the highest degree by spreading it amongst the Muslims.

It is obligatory upon the leaders to separate between men and women, and that education is done for men separately and for women separately, and for the hospitals to have no free mixing within them, thus there being a section for women specifically separate from the men’s section.

And that which takes place from the extreme necessities, then the necessities have their own rulings. If a woman is in need to be treated by a man or the likes of this, then there is no issue.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/16291

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_nikah_marriage
#Fatwas_on_women
#Fatwas_on_major_sins_and_prohibitions
-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بِسْمِ اللّــــهِ الرَّحْمَـــــــــنِ الرَّحِيمِ ***📩*** السُــــــــــــؤالُ :- يقول الاخ السائل: ما حكم الدراسة الاختلاطية بين الرجال والنساء في قاعة واحدة؟ ***📝*** الإجـــــــــــابة :- هذا لا يجوز، فإنه سبب للفتنة، قال الله تعالى: ﴿قُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner asks: What is the ruling of free-mixing in education between men and women in one classroom?

? The answer:

This is not permissible for it is the reason for fitnah (trial/temptation) taking place. Allah (تعالى) states:
﴿قُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِمْ وَيَحْفَظُوا فُرُوجَهُمْ ذَلِكَ أَزْكَى لَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ خَبِيرٌ بِمَا يَصْنَعُونَ* وَقُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ﴾
“Tell the believing men to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts). That is purer for them. Verily, Allah is All-Aware of what they do.”
“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts)”

Men getting together with women in one place, regardless of it being for education, governmental jobs, or non-governmental jobs whereby a man sees a woman and a woman sees a man, and perhaps more than that will occur such as sitting with her continuously. He sees her whilst she is wearing a beautified Jilbaab, and perhaps her beauty is on display whereby she beautifies her hands and face, and some women may expose their faces and some women may expose their eyes. Furthermore, many of the women wear tight Jilbaabs which outlines and cups her body parts, all of this is Fitnah, it is obligatory to distance oneself from this, and it is not permissible to work in a place where there is free-mixing with women as this is a reason for Fitnah.

In the Hadith, the Prophet ﷺ said:
(إِيَّاكُمْ وَالدُّخُولَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ)
"Beware of entering upon the women."
So a man from the Ansaar said:
يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، أَفَرَأَيْتَ الْحَمْو
"Allah's Apostle! What about Al-Hamu (the in-laws of the wife the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.)?
He said:
(الْحَمْوُ الْمَوْتُ)
“The in-laws of the wife are death itself.”
Agreed upon on the authority of Usaamah bin Zayd (رضي الله عنه).

And the Prophet ﷺ said:
(اتَّقُوا الدُّنْيَا وَاتَّقُوا النِّسَاءَ، فَإِنَّ أَوَّلَ فِتْنَةِ بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ كَانَتْ فِي النِّسَاءِ)
“Beware of (the temptations of) this world and beware of (the temptations of) women, for the first trial of the children of Israel had to do with women."
Reported by Muslim on the authority of Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri (رضي الله عنه).

And the Prophet ﷺ said:
(أَيُّمَا امْرَأَةٍ اسْتَعْطَرَتْ، فَمَرَّتْ عَلَى قَوْمٍ لِيَجِدُوا مِنْ رِيحِهَا فَهِيَ زَانِيَةٌ)
“Any woman who puts on perfume then passes by people so that they can smell her fragrance then she is an adulteress.”
Reported by Ahmad, Abu Dawud and An-Nasa’i on the authority of Abu Musa al-Ash’ari (رضي الله عنه) and it is a Sahih Hadith.

From the greatest of things that the enemies of Islam strive for is the calling to men and women free-mixing in the work place, rather they even call for her participation in recruitment and in the army. This is from the plots of the enemies of Islam to corrupt the Muslims so that immorality can become present amongst them, and for Zina (illegal sexual intercourse) to become widespread.

This is from the greatest reasons of falling into Zina, for a man to sit with a woman, to be alone with her, to speak and laugh with her, we seek Allahs refuge.

The Prophet ﷺ said:
(لَا يَخْلُوَنَّ رَجُلٌ بِامْرَأَةٍ إِلَّا كَانَ ثَالِثَهُمَا الشَّيْطَانُ)
“No man should be alone with a woman because Shaytaan will be the third one present.”
Reported by Ahmad on the authority of ‘Umar bin al-Khattaab (رضي الله عنه).

These are reasons for Fitnah taking place, and for the hearts to become sick. How many people started and became lenient with regards to looking, and then after looking it was followed with conversing and speaking, then smiling and laughing, then after that setting dates and meeting up, and then before he knows, Shaytaan tempts him into falling into the immorality of Zina, refuge is sought from Allah.

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بِسْمِ اللّــــهِ الرَّحْمَـــــــــنِ الرَّحِيمِ ***📩*** السُــــــــــــؤالُ :- يقول الاخ السائل: ما حكم الدراسة الاختلاطية بين الرجال والنساء في قاعة واحدة؟ ***📝*** الإجـــــــــــابة :- هذا لا يجوز، فإنه سبب للفتنة، قال الله تعالى: ﴿قُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

A man says: His wife is fatigued from pregnancy, and her fatigue leads to extreme frailness in the bones which leads to lack of movement from her, is it permissible for her to use some methods of contraception?

? The answer:

If the fatigue that she goes through is excessive according to the intelligent proficient doctors, then there is no issue in preventing from the angle of removing the greater harm by taking the lesser of the two evils. It is permissible to remove the greater of the two evils, rather a person is commanded with this due to the speech of the Prophet (ﷺ):
(لاَ ضَرَرَ وَلاَ ضِرَارَ)
"There should neither be harming (of others without cause), nor reciprocating harm (between two parties)."

And before that the speech of Allah (سبحانه وتعالى):
﴿يُرِيدُ ٱللَّهُ بِكُمُ ٱلْيُسْرَ وَلَا يُرِيدُ بِكُمُ ٱلْعُسْرَ﴾
“Allah intends for you ease, and He does not want to make things difficult for you.”

And the speech of Allah (تعالى):
﴿وَمَا جَعَلَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِى ٱلدِّينِ مِنْ حَرَجٍۢ ﴾
“And He has not laid upon you in religion any hardship”.

However, it is incumbent to investigate the speech of the doctors, and all aid and assistance is sought from Allah alone.

Likewise, one must take the type of contraception which has the least harm, so she must not go and take those methods of contraception which lead to a greater harm than she is already facing.

As for using contraception without a need then it is Haram if it causes harm to the woman, and disliked if it doesn’t cause her harm, because it leads to harming her and preventing offspring which the legislation has commanded with and encouraged.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/16782

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_general_and_specific_affairs
#Fatwas_on_women

-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بسم اللــــه الرحمـــــــــن الرحيم ***📩*** الســــــــــؤال :-   رجل يقول: أهله تتعب من الحمل، ويؤدي تعبها إلى هشاشة في العظام بشكلٍ كبير مما يؤدي إلى قلةِ حركتها، فهل له أن يستخدم بعض موانع الحمل؟ ***📝*** الإجــــــابة :- إن كانت الأتعاب التي تحصل عليها شديدة…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

From the well-known affairs is that the one who leaves of an obligation from the obligations of the prayer intentionally then his prayer is invalid, what is the evidence for this?

? The answer:

Firstly: The speech of the questioner is with regards to the obligation which is not a pillar, as for the pillar, then leaving it off nullifies the prayer according to the unanimous concensus of the scholars.

However, his speech is with regards to an obligation that necessitates the prostration of forgetfulness if it is forgotten.

The evidence that the one who leaves it off intentionally then his prayer is invalid is the Hadith of ‘A’ishah (رضي الله عنها) in the Saheehayn that the Prophet (ﷺ) said:
(مَنْ أَحْدَثَ فِي أَمْرِنَا هَذَا مَا لَيْسَ مِنْهُ فَهُوَ رَدٌّ)
“He who espouses a new affair in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not from it will have it rejected (by Allah).”
And in the narration of Muslim:
(مَنْ عَمِلَ عَمَلاً لَيْسَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْرُنَا فَهُوَ رَدٌّ)
“He who did any act for which there is no sanction from our behalf, that is to be rejected.”

Hence, leaving of an obligation intentionally indicates negligence in the prayer, and showing no care for the commandments of Allah. You have left of an obligation from your own accord and not due to the legislation.

You have espoused in this religion and have transgressed against your Rabb. This is an indication of disobedience towards Allah and His Messenger, that one leaves of an obligation intentionally, how can his prayer be accepted?! He leaves off its obligations intentionally thus the prayer is invalid, Imam Ahmad mentioned this as well as others from the people of knowledge.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/16770

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_prayer_salah

-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بسم اللــــه الرحمـــــــــن الرحيم ***📩*** الســــــؤال :- من المشهور أن من ترك واجباً من واجبات الصلاة متعمداً بطلت صلاته فما الدليل على ذلك ؟  ***📝*** الإجــــــابة :- أولا: كلام السائل على الواجب الذي ليس بركن، أما الركن يتركه يبطل الصلاة بإجماع العلماء. ولكن…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner asks: Is the prayer nullified if the person prays and he has some food in his mouth?

? The answer:

If he swallows the food while it is manifest and he can get rid of it, and he can feel it, then it nullifies his prayer. If he put water in his mouth and spat it out, and he tries hard in removing the remains of the food but small remnants remain which he is not aware of, it flows with his saliva, then the scholars said: ‘It is not possible to take precaution against this and it does not nullify the prayer nor the fast’.

As for if he can feel it, and he can get rid of it, then he must not swallow it, not in the prayer and not during the fast, as it will nullify the worship. May Allah grand us and your success.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/16774

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_prayer_salah
#Fatwas_on_actions_of_the_prayer

-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بِسْمِ اللّــــهِ الرَّحْمَـــــــــنِ الرَّحِيمِ ***📩*** السُــــــــــــؤالُ :- يقول السائل: هل تبطل الصلاة على من صلى، وفي فمه شيء من الطعام؟ ***📝*** الإجـــــــــــابة :- إذا بلع ذلك الطعام وهو بَيِّنٌ يستطيع أن يتحرز منه، وهو يشعر به فتبطل صلاته. فإن كان قد…

In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful

? Question:

The questioner asks: Some people from the past due to ignorance got married in Ramadhaan and thus didn’t fast the whole month due to having intercourse with their spouse?

? The answer:

We seek refuge in Allah, this is a major sin, and the likes of this is not unknown amongst the Muslims. All the Muslims know that it is obligatory upon them to leave off food, drink and sexual intercourse. Hence, upon him is to seek repentance and to ask for forgiveness from this major sin.

If he believed that this was permissible for him due to ignorance, or due to him finding someone who issued him a verdict that this is permissible for the married individual as a concession from Allah, then this is extreme ignorance, however the affair is less serious and upon him is to make up the missed fasts.

If he was in doubt and he came across some people saying: ‘The married individual has a concession from fasting’ and so he didn’t fast, then this affair is less serious than the one before.

The one who takes sins lightly, then this is an extremely major sin and he is not able to make it up. As for the one who is in doubt, and he comes across those who issue him a religious verdict, thus believing this is permissible for him, then for such a person is to make up the missed fasts. As for the first person, then making up the fasts will not benefit him as he intended to transgress the boundaries.

The second person: was in doubt due to ignorance that due to his marriage he is not obligated to fast. This is possible of happening in some remote places faraway from knowledge and education, or amongst the non-Arabs, or the likes of this, so this second person must make up the missed fasts. As for the first person who intended whilst knowing that it is impermissible, then making it up will not benefit him, upon him is to seek repentance, to have remorse and to seek forgiveness, and upon him is to seek forgiveness from Allah in abundance.

Is there Kafarah (expiation) upon him for each day? i.e. for the one who is not ignorant of its impermissibility?
The answer: If he was not fasting from the start of the day to begin with, he did not intend to fast to begin with, then there are no Kafarahs upon him as he left off fasting to start with. He did not even intend to fast. As for if he broke his fast with sexual intercourse, then upon him is Kafarah for each day.

And without a doubt the Kafarah is transferred to feeding (the poor/needy) as fasting will be very difficult upon him. i.e. if we were to say: ‘for each day he must fast’, then he must fast sixty months. Thus, it is transferred to feeding, there is no doubt that it is transferred to feeding, and this is from the ease of the legislation upon him, and Allah knows best.

Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/ibnhezam/16728

#Fatwas_on_fiqh
#Fatwas_on_fasting
#Fatwas_on_expiations_for_those_who_break_their_fast

-----------------------------------
To subscribe to the fatwas of His Eminence Sheikh Muhammad bin Hizam via Telegram:-
https://t.me/ibnhezam
And in English:-
http://t.me/ibnhezamen

Telegram

فتاوى فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن حزام الفضلي البعداني حفظه الله وتولاه

بِسْمِ اللّــــهِ الرَّحْمَـــــــــنِ الرَّحِيمِ ***📩*** السُــــــــــــؤالُ :- يقول السائل: بعضهم بسبب الجهل في أزمنة متقدمة تزوج في رمضان، فأفطر رمضان كاملًا، بمعاشرته لأهله؟. ***📝*** الإجـــــــــــابة :- نعوذ بالله، هذا ذنب عظيم، ومثل هذا ما يُجهل بين المسلمين،…