It's over Zelensky

https://youtu.be/x5QEz1AK7ww?si=eR7uC0VqzGYm6Vx9

2025] IEHC 45 - Record no. 2021/1327 P - THE HIGH COURT - Between: TRACEY O’MAHONY (Plaintiff) and MINISTER FOR HEALTH, IRELAND AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (Defendants)

On the 31st of January 2025, Judge Nessa Cahill delivered a High Court written judgement stating that our legal case challenging the constitutionality of the Covid-19 laws was moot and should not be allowed to proceed any further.

Judge Cahill found that the regulations introduced under the Health Preservation and Protection and Other Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act 2020 had:

· “potentially far-reaching and invasive effects on individuals and on society as a whole”, and that
· “there is and can be no doubt that the powers conferred by Section 31A were exceptional and unprecedented; that very extensive powers were conferred on the Minister by Section 31A; or that Regulations introduced pursuant to those powers did impose extraordinary restrictions on the personal freedoms and rights of residents of the State.”, and that
· “there is and can be no dispute that the powers and restrictions introduced in the face of the Covid pandemic were exceptional, extraordinary, unprecedented, and had a highly invasive impact on the rights and freedoms of residents of the State (among others).”

Nevertheless, Judge Cahill found that the question of whether it is “in the public interest” or “in the interest of the proper and due administration of justice” for this case to proceed can only be answered firmly in the negative.”

The Judge stated that the case was “not a situation in which there is an issue of exceptional public interest such that either party has a present, material interest in the case or that it is in the interests of the public or the proper and due administration of justice for the Proceedings to continue.”

The Judge criticised the fact that I did not allow myself to become a criminal (as in, secure a criminal conviction under the Covid-19 laws) or the fact that I did not claim damages (as in, financial compensation) as one of the remedies sought.

The Judge also criticised the length of time it took to bring the case on for hearing (noting that I have much evidence to prove that I was in no way at fault in this regard).

The Judge also provisionally determined that I should be liable for the costs of the State (which I would estimate to be a couple of hundred thousand euro), although I am permitted to make a written submission on costs before 14 February 2025.

I do not make decisions or take action in an impulsive or reactionary fashion, so I will consider my next moves quietly and thoroughly, but rest assured that whatever decision I make will be strategic. I have a better understanding now of how the system works (or does not work), so I will be calculated in my next moves.

I would have liked to have been in a position to make a video explaining the judgement in detail, but I am still without electricity, internet and phone reception some 9 days on from Storm Éowyn, however, I will make a video in the coming weeks to keep donors updated, but I felt it was important to get an update to donors as early as possible following the judgement.

Initiating this case has cost me a lot both personally and professionally but I still believe it was the right decision. I would like to sincerely thank everyone for their unwavering support to date and I will provide a further update as soon as I can.

I won my appeal case today in the circuit court. Justice prevailed. I was just over half a kilometre outside the state enforced 2 kilometre limit during lockdown restrictions, and subsequently had to travel 4,928km in my non-electric vehicle for 11 court appearances in relation to this one minor and spurious charge. Obviously, the Gardaí cared about Covid but don't give a damn about climate change ?.

Just to clarify, I was led to believe by the court services 13 months ago (when I was convicted in my absence) that I would face a jury trial on appeal, which added extra pressure when facing this case today. As it turned out, when I arrived in court, there was no jury, and the case was heard by a circuit court judge instead.

Note original video removed due to one error on the voting records of one TD

Dr Gerry Waters IFP will also be in attendance. 7:00pm.

If ever you needed further evidence for the contempt this Government have for the Irish people and democracy in general

They intend to hold a 90 minute debate on one of the most controversial pieces of legislation tomorrow at 21.49

The General Election is fast approaching. Let them know this is the nail in the coffin.

Go Fund Me: Covid-19 Legal Case - Hearing on the 31st October 2024

The purpose of this video is:

1. To briefly explain the background to the case we initiated on the 2nd of March 2021;

2. To explain the steps we have taken in the case to date; and

3. Most importantly to advise donors that there is a one-day hearing taking place in the High Court on Thursday the 31st of October 2024, to decide whether or not our case will be allowed to proceed - as the State are currently arguing that as the Covid-19 laws are no longer in place, our case should not be heard. Under this point 3, I will also explain the arguments that the State have advanced and also the counter arguments that we have made by means of Affidavit and legal submissions to the courts – all of which will be argued by our Barristers on the 31st of October 2024 in the Four Courts in Dublin.

https://t.me/+OZG7eG_Q0QQ4NjE0

Telegram

Eireann Go Bragh

A place for Irish People, that's All About Ireland