https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=6750bb78d2eda07388e71f1e

https://open.substack.com/pub/alexkrainer/p/are-they-planning-a-false-flag-event?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

https://youtu.be/v77dqZAb-tM?si=_yCLCi-lSYj5hQL7

https://informedchoice.substack.com/p/breaking-alert-if-you-buy-meat-at?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=600367&post_id=152370592&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=p0e1a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

It’s time. The end will be a new beginning

Justice will be served
WE WILL EXPOSE THEM ALL!

This is an old CIA memo from 1967 to all bureau chiefs around the world.
This memo is the SOURCE of the phrase “conspiracy theorist.” 

After the Warren commission published its conclusions about Kennedy’s assassin, books were published casting doubt about the reports conclusions.

The CIA instructed its agents to quash all debate by labeling anyone asking questions as conspiracy theorists.  
What was the CIA so afraid of? 

What’s wrong with questions and debate? What were they trying to hide? 

Why is it that anyone who questions the nature of COVID-19, potential treatments, and concerns about vaccines is labeled a conspiracy theorist?

Why are they trying to keep us silent if everything done is right and good for our nation?

He is already posting and exposing the deep state, the time has come:
https://t.me/TuckerCarlson

https://davidicke.com/2024/11/25/terminator-robot-dog-now-equipped-with-amphibious-capabilities/

'peter.dutton.mp@aph.gov.au'; 'david.coleman.mp@aph.gov.au'

'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'senator.matt.o'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'

Dear Mr. Dutton, Mr. Coleman, and Senators,

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024. This bill, and the underhanded way it is being rushed through Parliament, is an affront to Australian democracy, privacy, and freedom.

It is clear to me that the bipartisan tactics being used to force this legislation through are nothing short of dirty tricks designed to deceive the Australian people. Given the timing, it is evident that this bill is a Trojan horse for a digital surveillance system, disguised under the pretence of child safety. Australians will be forced to hand over sensitive personal information, including biometrics, to access social media platforms. Such a system poses an unacceptable risk to privacy, exposes individuals to data breaches, and opens the door to government overreach and corporate exploitation.

I am disgusted that our leaders—on both sides of the so-called “uniparty”—are working against the will and interests of the Australian people to pass a law that we clearly do not want. The rushed process of this bill, with only one day for submissions and two days for a Senate report, is a shameless attempt to stifle public scrutiny and dissent. It is not democratic; it is manipulative.

This legislation is fundamentally flawed, and the contradictions within it reveal its lack of credibility:

If the goal is to curb online addiction, why are video games exempt?
If the aim is to prevent online bullying, why are messaging platforms excluded?
If this measure is to protect children, why does it require all Australians—regardless of age—to submit to invasive identity verification systems?
Australians have already made it clear that we reject invasive surveillance measures, as evidenced by the widespread opposition to the MAD bill. To see another similarly intrusive proposal pushed forward so soon, with the same disregard for public sentiment, is not only disheartening—it is enraging.

If this bill, or anything like it, continues to be pursued, it will cost you my vote and the votes of my family permanently. We will not support leaders who prioritize control and surveillance over freedom and privacy. We will not support politicians who ignore the will of the people they are meant to represent.

I urge you to oppose this bill and any further attempts to push Australians into a digital surveillance system. Protecting children online is important, but it must be achieved through thoughtful, targeted measures that empower families and respect individual freedoms—not through deceitful, heavy-handed tactics.

This is your chance to show true leadership by standing up for democracy and the rights of Australians. Please, do not let us down.

Sincerely,