‘Notice’: ‘Bills of Exchange / Promissory Note’

https://claude.ai

claude.ai

Talk with Claude, an AI assistant from Anthropic

‘Bills of Exchange / ‘Promissory Notes’

After in putting all relevant information & Data related to ‘Bills of Exchange’ & ‘Promissory Note’s.

This ‘Notice’ dealing with Bills of Exchange /Promissory Notes was generated by.

‘Anthropic’s ~ ‘Claude 3.5 Sonnet’ the newest most powerful AI assistant currently available for free.

Here is a draft comprehensive Notice based on the information provided:

-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;

‘Notice Regarding Legal Status & Acceptance of Promissory Notes’:

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]

[Date]

[Recipient Name]
[Recipient Address]

Dear [Recipient],

Re: Legal Status & Mandatory Acceptance of Promissory Notes.

This Notice serves to inform you of the legal status of promissory notes under UK law and your obligations as a creditor to accept them as valid payment.

‘Legal Status of Promissory Notes’

Promissory notes are defined and governed by the Bills of Exchange Act 1882. Section 83(1) of the Act states:

"A promissory note is an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another signed by the maker, engaging to pay, on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money, to, or to the order of, a specified person or to bearer."

Promissory notes are legally recognised as negotiable instruments and must be treated as cash. This principle has been affirmed by the highest courts in the UK:

In Fielding & Platt Ltd v Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.L.R. 357, Lord Denning stated:

"We have repeatedly said in this court that a bill of exchange or a promissory note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary."

This principle was earlier established in Jackson v Murphy [1887] 4 T.L.R. 92, where it was held that "a bill, cheque or note is given and taken in payment as so much cash, and not as merely given a right of action for the creditor to litigate a counterclaim."

‘Mandatory Acceptance of Promissory Notes’

As a creditor, you have a legal obligation to accept promissory notes as payment when properly tendered. This obligation stems from the following:

1. Bills of Exchange Act 1882, Section 52: "A bill of exchange is discharged by payment in due course by or on behalf of the drawee or acceptor."

2. Companies Act 2006, Section 52:
   "A bill of exchange or promissory note is deemed to have been made, accepted or endorsed on behalf of a company if made, accepted or endorsed in the name of, or by or on behalf or on account of, the company by a person acting under its authority."

3. Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 3-603 (as referenced in international commercial practice):
   "If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract."

Consequences of Non-Acceptance

Refusal to accept a properly tendered promissory note may have the following legal consequences:

1. Discharge of the underlying debt (Bills of Exchange Act 1882, Section 59)
2. Loss of right to claim interest after the due date (UCC 3-603(c))
3. Potential breach of contract and associated damages

Your Responsibilities

As a creditor, you are required to:

1. Accept promissory notes that meet the requirements outlined in the Bills of Exchange Act 1882
2. Treat promissory notes as cash, as per established case law
3. Process promissory notes in accordance with standard banking procedures

If you have concerns about the validity of a tendered promissory note, you must raise these concerns promptly and in good faith. Blanket refusals to accept promissory notes are not legally justifiable.

Please ensure that all relevant staff in your organisation are made aware of these legal obligations. Any future refusal to accept a properly tendered promissory note will be treated as a violation of UK law and may result in legal action.

If you require any clarification on the contents of this Notice, please contact me in writing within 7 days of receipt.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]

This is a guide to assist you, knowing some specifics and with a clear understanding of what must be done and how to correctly challenge a claimant you shall be in a position standing as the beneficiary you are.

Equity follows the law.

This law is settled law of the land, common law…

As equity follows this, it is secondary to it, and comes into play if there is any discrepancy.

Equity can be heard in all courts since the Judicature Act 1873.

Section 25 of the Judicature Act: It was foreseen that a court which applied the rules of both common law & of equity… would face a conflict.

Where the common law rules would produce one result, and equity another.

Section 25 of the Judicature Act 1873 provided that if there was any conflict between these principles, then equity was to prevail…

Since there is a trust in play [of titles Three trust certainties diagram] there are two objects and two sets of rules, in essence; a beneficiary receives the benefits and a trustee is legally responsible…

Using specific legislation correctly, allows us to evidence that a claimant has no right to a claim (chose) because they are on the at law side of the trust, the ‘legal’ side as opposed to ‘equitable’ side where the beneficiary sits…

It stands to reason, that a claim cannot be brought against a beneficiary by a trustee or its agent…

Without a choice there is no claim…

Trustees & Agents cannot have a claim against a beneficiary.

Any attempt to claim is a breach of trust and restitution due to the beneficiary(s); (us)…

By asking pertinent questions, by way of a correctly formatted DSAR, no templates or letter, that an agent is legally charged to oblige, pursuant to specific legislation, we evidence the agent (acting for trustee) has no choice.

https://solutionsuneed.co.uk/an-introduction-to-using-equity

Solutions You Need -

About equity - Solutions You Need

What is equity? Maxim of Equity: He who does equity must come with clean hands.“this is NOT legal advice” This is not a game, people get into trouble because they don’t know what they are doing, but when you do, it becomes quite fun and that is what it should…

Reading between the lines we have 3 choices..!

1. Go with the ‘Deep State’… under ‘WEF’ (World Economic Forum) theNazi’s that are pushing a version of ‘GESARA/NESARA’ where we… “own nothing & will be happy”… and there'll only be 500 million left people worldwide…!!!

2. Go with Trump (Controlled Opposition) who is pushing a version of ‘GESARA/NESARA’…where we will have loads of worthless currency via the QFS (Quantum Financial System) 14% tax etc… and we will end up… “owning nothing and be happy”… WhereThe… ‘Narcissistic Psychopathic Elite’s… will still control us all…!!!

3. Or Help build a world based on the people being the creditors, owning our own property, no taxes... & living a fantastic peaceful life…

Which sounds better to you…???

We control our own lives…!