“Researchers developing Australia’s first mRNA Covid vaccine say they may have solved the “immune imprinting” issue that has contributed to the declining effectiveness of boosters as the virus mutates.
Immune imprinting, also known as original antigenic sin, occurs when the body’s original immune response to a virus — either from vaccination or infection — becomes less effective against new variants of the same virus.

“The concept of immune imprinting is not a new one — the same phenomenon occurs with influenza, and there is now mounting evidence of widespread imprinting attributed to exposure to ancestral Covid-19 strains,” Professor Colin Pouton from MIPS said in a statement.” 👇

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

From Professor Mark Morgan who was the infectious disease expert for the Royal Australian College of GPs when I asked him about immune imprinting earlier this year:
“I’ve never heard of the word immune imprinting until you mentioned it.”

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

After four years the truth is slowly coming out even though no one will admit they were wrong.

The concept of immune imprinting isn’t new - that is correct.

We are all told not to use overuse antibiotics yet this caution is thrown out the door for vaccines because Big Pharma has no liability for vaccines.

So why didn’t the “experts” tell us this years ago when they were claiming a vaccine produced for the “Alpha” variant would be effective against the “Omicron” variant, when clearly it wasn’t.

And why don’t the experts tell this to employers who are still enforcing mandates for people to get vaccinated with vaccines (assuming they are safe which they aren’t) that are protecting against outdated variants.

People who are being discriminated against should print this article off and take it to any potential job interview or likewise University students who have to be jabbed for work experience in clinics.

Vaccines will never be effective against rapidly mutating pathogens such as mRNA viruses. They will however damage the immune system through immune imprinting.

Why wasn’t Professor Pouton warning people about immune imprinting years ago and why doesn’t the Royal Australian College of GPs actually employ someone that knows what they are talking about in regard to infectious disease.

It’s a disgrace Prof Morgan knew nothing about immune imprinting but was still promoting boosters.

Quote from:
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/australias-first-mrna-covid-vaccine-candidate-could-solve-immune-imprinting-problem/news-story/0082546e557b54c71bbbb6af81e738d3

#auspol

“Dr Kerr: It's acceptable for pharmaceutical preparations to have a small number of particles present.

Senator RENNICK: But my question is: what is the particle? That's a big particle, 10 microns. I mean, the lipids were like -

Dr Kerr: I think l'd have to go back and have a look at that FOl to make sure it actually was 10 microns.

Senator RENNICK: I can give it to you, if you like.

Dr Kerr: Perhaps we could go back and have a look at it and take that on notice.

Senator RENNICK: Okay. l'd like to know exactly what it was, if that's okay.”

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

And the answer is:

“The specification for the particulates test in the European Pharmacopoeia is:

The preparation complies with the test if the average number of particles present in the units tested does not exceed 6000 per container equal to or greater than 10 um and does not exceed 600 per container equal to or greater than 25 um.

Therefore, the results for particulates shown in FOl 3390-11 are well within the pharmacopoeial requirements.

The particles are not DNA. DNA is highly soluble in aqueous solution, so any DNA present in the vaccines would not appear as micron scale particles. Batch release testing includes residual DNA quantitation on every batch, and this ensures DNA (above trace amounts) would be detected.

mRNA vaccines may contain trace amounts of residual DNA at no more than 10 nanograms (ng) of DNA per dose (http://www.tga.gov.au/.../guidance-18-impurities-drug...).

The limit of 10 ng per dose prevents the formation of particles large enough to be detected in the micron scale.

All injectable or infusion products, including vaccines, are permitted to contain subvisible particles if they comply with the US FDA and European Pharmacopeia 2.9.19 specification for particulate matter. These limits were established after a long history of use of injectables without adverse events occurring in the presence of particulates within this specification.

There is no requirement to identify subvisible particles counted in injectable or infusion products, however these particles are likely to consist of extraneous undissolved particulates from the manufacturing process (e.g. trace amounts of dust or fibres) and not DNA.”

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

And there you have it. The TGA don’t know what are they putting into your bodies.

10 microns is a big particle when you’re talking in biochemistry terms.

It’s a third of a dose size of the lipids.

Rather than actually answer my question as to what the particles are they skirt the answer by claiming they fall within European guidelines.

The same as when they use the WHO guidelines to ignore autopsy reports about reported deaths.

Furthermore, what does 6,000 per container mean? How big is the container? How many batches does a container hold?

And does this apply to DNA?

What this answer tells us is the TGA don’t know what is in the Covid-19 batches and they have misled the Senate by providing a misleading answer.

#auspol

MUST WATCH 👆

https://x.com/broadbentmp/status/1845312358874509758?s=46

https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1843184197814694293?t=kAd_FlV4mDmxu92RvUw3cA&s=19