On the Illogical Framing of Concepts and Terms by White Identitarians
by The Fascifist

This short article explores several claims that white identitarians make regarding the term "white" and its alleged synonymity with several other terms. The purpose of this short article is to address each claim and to clarify whether these claims are logically coherent or not given the overall framing in and through which they are used.

——————
SEE ALSO
——————

What is the Liberal World Order of the Atlanticist West?

Capitalism is an Important Pillar of Western Civilization / White Identity

America was Founded as an anti-Christian Social Order

On the Ontological Difference between Medieval Europe and the Atlanticst WestThe Modern World: White and WesternThey Gave Us ModernismRace is Ontological

The White Man's Burden: The Faustian Eschatology of the Modern World

Yes, hindutva and white nationalism are very similar ideologies, Hindutva may even be downstream from it.
-Both are classically liberal
-Both are capitalist
-Both are founded on an arbitrary category (physical traits collectively called white and Different religions and philosophies of the Indian subcontinent collectively called Hindu) which differs from the traditional language based nations
-Both trace themselves to an ancient group which was apparently superior to all others at the time and is the progenitor of all great civilizations that came after
-Both stand in a false opposition to the progressive liberal ideology of the masses and the state (in different degrees)

It's those specific Greeks Plato and Aristotle. They are mainly responsible. Not all Greeks agreed with them. Parmenides and Zeno being good examples.

It's this dualistic ontology school of thought universally that is to blame.

The West is a Greek invention that perverted Europe and America and is now perverting the entire globe.

The Greek imbecile plato disrupted the natural order by insisting on duality and the separation of substance. The Greeks cannot be trusted.

Nick Fuentes has begun to understand that white nationalism is simply a classical liberal reactionary movement

*"The problem with ideological 'White Nationalism' is that (their conception of) race is not a sufficient organizing principle.

There is this weird egalitarian sentiment I hear from true WNs that says something like -- 'We can resolve all differences between genders, ideologies, religions, classes etc. AFTER we secure a White ethnostate.' Alt Hype even argued that gays shouldn't be criticized.

Which seems to imply that until then, the WN political community is going to be a gay, Jewish, liberal, feminist, pluralistic, race commune? Pass."*

-- Nick Fuentes on April 1, 2024

——————
SEE ALSO
——————

Why Liberals Love White Nationalism

The White Identity Ideology

Understanding AIP

The Invention of White People[The Meaning of White Identity

A Brief History of Political Whiteness](https://t.me/LiberalismAndWhiteness/659)

White Identity is a Flat Negative Identity

Catch 22 on Whiteness

Admissions of Secular Humanism by White Identitarians

The End of the Liberal World Order of the Atlanticist West?

One of the most important dogmas white people espouse is the importance of protecting democracy which they admit are not historical norms. They admit that liberal democracy is fragile and that certain and perpetual conditions must be enforced in order to artificially extend its longevity.

In contrast to the white man's enlightened democracy, there exists the despotic autocracy of the "non white savages" which constantly threatens the precious "freedoms" of white society.

——————
SEE ALSO
——————

What is the Liberal World Order of the Atlanticist West?

Capitalism is an Important Pillar of Western Civilization / White Identity

America was Founded as an anti-Christian Social OrderSeparation of Church and State: Secularism is Anti-Christian

On the Ontological Difference Between Medieval Europe and the Atlanticist WestThe Modern World: White and Western

The White Man's Burden: The Faustian Eschatology of the Modern World They Gave Us Modernism

The Ustase were not pro White

*The Ustase were a Croatian fascist and ultranationalist organization that emerged in the early 20th century, particularly gaining prominence during World War II. They subscribed to Croatian racial nationalism and advocated for an independent Croatian state. The Ustase promoted certain racial theorists such as Hans Gunther, their beliefs were not straightforwardly aligned with the concept of a "white race" as commonly understood.

The Ustase's racial ideology was primarily focused on Croat ethnocentrism rather than adherence to a broader secular liberal notion of whiteness. They believed in the sovereignty of the Croatian people and sought to establish a racially Croatian state, which they envisioned as ethnically homogeneous and free from perceived threats such as Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies.

The Ustase's racial views were heavily influenced by both fascist ideology and Croatian nationalism. They viewed Croatians as a distinct and separate ethnic group, and this was in opposition against any kind of broader white political identity. In fact, the Ustase often clashed with other fascist groups, such as the Nazis, over racial issues because their primary concern was Croatian nationalism rather than pan-Europeanism of any kind.

Furthermore, the Ustase's actions during World War II, particularly their treatment of Serbs, Jews, and other non-Croatian ethnic groups, demonstrate that their racial ideology was ethno-exclusionary and thus completely incompatible with "white identitarianism." They pursued ethnic cleansing and genocide against populations they considered to be threats to their vision of an ethnically pure Croatian state.*