Ilhom's blog | IELTS 8.0

Description
Ilkhom Abdukarimov IELTS 8.0
L 8.5 R 9.0 W 7.0

General English| DTM | IELTS

Write @mr_instructor
We recommend to visit

? SOL Trending that prints by @soul_sniper_bot

? Buy: @buysolanatrending
? Contact: @zapthecoin

Last updated 7 months, 1 week ago

- OTZIV @ISBOT_OLDSALE
- ВЛАДЕЛЕЦ @TURKRESALLER
- UC SHOP @OLD_SALEUC
- UC NARXI @OLDSALEUC


CRYPTO @Old_Savdo_P2P

ADMINLAR
@OLD_SAVDO_ABDULAZIZ
@OLD_SAVDO_GZ

Last updated 6 months, 2 weeks ago

NFA as always
Owner @CrypticMaestro

Last updated 7 months, 3 weeks ago

hace 1 año, 9 meses

You can call it a buck.

A buck = a dollar

hace 1 año, 9 meses
hace 1 año, 9 meses

Don't count your chickens before they hatch

hace 1 año, 10 meses

What problems do you have in writing?

Comment, and we will discuss your problems and how to overcome them in the Live Stream

hace 1 año, 10 meses

Let's have 35 reactions, and I will include a prize for active students.

hace 1 año, 10 meses

Guys, I am starting ?READING & LISTENING Marathon What is included: 25-real exam and pretest passages. Special group where you can discuss your answers with other marathon participants. Lifelong access to the materials Trickiest question will be explained…

hace 1 año, 10 meses

try to guess the meaning of this saying:

people who live in glass house shouldn`t throw stones

hace 1 año, 10 meses

Examples of strawman arguments
The following is a typical example of a strawman argument:

Teaching assistant: the homework assignment was much harder than we thought, so I think we should give a few extra points to students who completed it.

Professor: that’s a terrible idea. If we give everyone a perfect score for no reason, students won’t bother working hard in the future.

In this example, the professor uses a strawman argument, by misrepresenting their assistant’s stance in three ways:

The professor argues against giving everyone a bonus, while the teaching assistant suggested giving it only to students who completed the assignment.
The professor argues against giving students a perfect score, while their assistant suggested giving students only a few extra points.
The professor argues against giving students a bonus for no reason, while their assistant suggested giving them the bonus because the assignment was harder than expected.
In doing all of this, the professor makes it much easier for themself to attack their assistant’s stance.

Keep in mind that it doesn’t matter whether the overall claims of the professor who is using the strawman are true or not (i.e. that if everyone got a perfect score for no reason, then students won’t work hard in the future). This is because the professor’s argument is a fallacious misrepresentation of their opponent’s stance, meaning that it’s entirely irrelevant to the discussion in the first place.

hace 1 año, 10 meses

do you know the strawman argument/fallacy?

We recommend to visit

? SOL Trending that prints by @soul_sniper_bot

? Buy: @buysolanatrending
? Contact: @zapthecoin

Last updated 7 months, 1 week ago

- OTZIV @ISBOT_OLDSALE
- ВЛАДЕЛЕЦ @TURKRESALLER
- UC SHOP @OLD_SALEUC
- UC NARXI @OLDSALEUC


CRYPTO @Old_Savdo_P2P

ADMINLAR
@OLD_SAVDO_ABDULAZIZ
@OLD_SAVDO_GZ

Last updated 6 months, 2 weeks ago

NFA as always
Owner @CrypticMaestro

Last updated 7 months, 3 weeks ago