I have tried to warn everybody from day one!

Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102

Share & Subscribe To World View Today (t.me/WorldViewToday)

Telegram

World View Today

Seeking the truth of our times. Support Me: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/worldviewtoday [email protected]

⚠️Reasons Why I Believe Telegram Remains Secure and Will Continue to Be:

Several factors challenge the notion that Telegram’s security is at risk, even in the face of external pressure:

1. End-to-End Encryption: Telegram employs end-to-end encryption for private chats, meaning not even the platform’s administrators, including Pavel Durov, can access users’ messages. This makes it difficult for intelligence agencies to intercept communications, even if Durov were to crack under pressure.

2. History of Resistance to Government Demands: Pavel Durov and Telegram have a strong track record of resisting government pressure to provide access to user data. Durov has previously faced challenges from Russian and other governments and consistently refused to comply.

3. Decentralized Infrastructure: Telegram operates on a decentralized infrastructure with servers spread across different countries. This complicates any attempt by a single government or agency to gain full access to the platform’s backend.

4. Public Awareness: Telegram users worldwide are well-informed about the platform’s privacy policies. Any suspicious changes in security protocols would likely spark immediate backlash from users and cybersecurity experts alike.

5. Publicly Accessible Channels: Many Telegram channels operate openly and without encryption. Much of the information shared on the platform is already available to the public, reducing the need for covert access to sensitive data.

6. Russia’s Contingency Measures: It’s likely that the Russian government has alternative security measures in place for critical communications, should they harbor any doubts about Telegram’s full reliability. Even if a breach were possible, it wouldn’t necessarily grant access to all essential Russian communications.

https://t.me/WeTheMedia/106981

Telegram

We The Media

If Pavel Durov cracks under pressure, the CIA might gain access to Telegram's backend, giving the US intel blob access to all of Russia's communication channels, Mike Benz tells Tucker Carlson. Russia has been using Telegram as their main communication network…

❤️ Thanks everyone for your support and love!

Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram.

This was surprising for several reasons: 

1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”. 

2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France.

3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. 

Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue.

Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country. We've done it many times. When Russia demanded we hand over “encryption keys” to enable surveillance, we refused — and Telegram got banned in Russia. When Iran demanded we block channels of peaceful protesters, we refused — and Telegram got banned in Iran. We are prepared to leave markets that aren’t compatible with our principles, because we are not doing this for money. We are driven by the intention to bring good and defend the basic rights of people, particularly in places where these rights are violated.

All of that does not mean Telegram is perfect. Even the fact that authorities could be confused by where to send requests is something that we should improve. But the claims in some media that Telegram is some sort of anarchic paradise are absolutely untrue. We take down millions of harmful posts and channels every day. We publish daily transparency reports (like this or this ). We have direct hotlines with NGOs to process urgent moderation requests faster.

However, we hear voices saying that it’s not enough. Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform. That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon. 

I hope that the events of August will result in making Telegram — and the social networking industry as a whole — safer and stronger. Thanks again for your love and memes ?

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Ukraine, Gaza & Taiwan: The US is Risking ALL OUT WAR with Russia & China

Share & Subscribe To World View Today (t.me/WorldViewToday)

*‼️ROE V WADE, A MANUFACTURED LIE‼️***

‘Jane Roe’ confesses on her deathbed that she was paid to say and play the part.

They just needed a manufactured case in order to legalise abortion because it’s an incredibly lucrative business.

Child murder and sacrifice is one of the tenants of the luciferian elites.

None of it is about woman’s rights, they don’t give a damn about women! In any case nobody should have the right to end another being’s life!

We must end the legalisation of murder.

Share & Subscribe To World View Today (t.me/WorldViewToday)

POLITICS
Hunter Biden guilty in criminal gun trial

The house of card is busy collapsing.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/11/hunter-biden-trial-verdict-reached-in-gun-case.html

Share & Subscribe To World View Today (t.me/WorldViewToday)

CNBC

Hunter Biden guilty in criminal gun trial

A jury has reached a verdict at the criminal gun trial of Hunter Biden in federal court in Wilmington, Delaware.

Remember when they claimed aircraft wings cut through a mesh of reinforced steel beams

Share & Subscribe To World View Today (t.me/WorldViewToday)

The difference between a Constitutional Republic and a democracy.
Remember this every time you hear the democrats crying about losing our "democracy".

Share & Subscribe To World View Today (t.me/WorldViewToday)