‘Totalitar boshqaruvning eng ideal subyekti o‘zini g‘oyaga ishontirgan Natsist yoki Kommunistlar emas, balki fakt va fiksiyalar (ya’ni reallikni his etmaydigan) hamda haqiqiy va soxta (fikrlash standardlari yo‘q) o‘rtasidagi farqni ajrata olmaydigan shaxslardir.’

~ Hannah Arendt, Totalitarizm kelib chiqishi (asoslari), 474-bet

@CJandLP

‘Shunday ulkan ishlab chiqarish va ayriboshlash vositalarini yaratgan jamiyat o’z afsun va sehri orqali uyg’otgan quyi dunyoni ortiq boshqara olmay qolgan afsungar kabidir’

Kommunist Manifestosi, 1848-yil.

@CJandLP

‘Businessmen became politicians and were acclaimed as statesmen, while statesmen were taken seriously only if they talked the language of successful businessmen.’

~ Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

@CJandLP

‘The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freemen and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another carried on an uniterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary re-constitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes’

~ Marx, Communist Manifesto

@CJandLP

‘…just as the Christians are equal in heaven, but unequal on earth, so individual members of the nation are equal in the heaven of their political world, but unequal in the earthly existence of society.’

~ Marx, Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right

@CJandLP

Cohen taqdim etgan tahliliy doiraga ko‘ra, jamiyatning u yoki bu guruhi—bo‘lganda ham bunday guruh jamiyat a’zolarining juda kichik bir qatlamini tashkil etadi—tomonidan muayyan deviant xulq-atvor namoyish etiladi hamda mazkur xulq-atvor jamiyatga kichik zarar yetkazadi. U nashr etgan tadqiqotda bu Mod va Rock guruhlari tomonidan amalga oshirilgan vandalizm harakatlari edi.

Keyingi bosqichda, media voqealarni bo‘rttirib ko‘rsatadi. Bunda yetkazilgan zarar ko‘lami, harakat doirasi bo‘rttirib ko‘rsatiladi. Bundan tashqari, deviant guruh a’zolari jamiyatga tahdid sifatida (Cohen bu jarayonni Folk Devils ya’ni Iblis kimsalarning yaratilishi deb tushuntiradi) gavdalantiriladi.

Bunda media, davlat yoki diniy institutlar jamiyatdagi xulq-atvor normalari chegaralarini belgilab beruvchi ahloq yaratuvchilari (moral entrepreneur) sifatida jarayonlarda ishtirok etadi. Jarayonlar esa muayyan darajadagi simvolizatsiyani o‘z ichiga qamrab oladi. U yoki bu obyekt yoki dress kod ahloqiy sarosima keltirib chiqargan guruh bilan bog‘lanadi. Simvollar ishtirok etgan har qanday jarayon huquqqa xilof hatti-harakat deb e’tirof etiladi.

Natijada, jamiyatda disproportsional qo‘rquv yoki sarosima shakllanadi. Buning disproportsionalligi shundaki, jamiyatda generatsiya qilingan qo‘rquv/sarosima darajasi jamiyatga real tahdid darajasidan oshib ketadi.

Yakunda esa, bularning barchasi yuqoridagi deviant guruhga nisbatan disproportsional davlat ta’sir choralari ko‘rilishiga olib keladi. Masalan, sovet davrida yuzaga kelgan g‘arb yurish-turish va kiyinishiga amal qiluvchi stlyagalar dastlab submadaniyat sifatida qaralgan. Ularga gazetalarda, sovet yig‘inlarida bo‘rttirilgan reaksiyalarga uchragan. Bu esa jamiyatda noformal politsiyani shakllantirilgan. Komsomolchi otryadlar uzun soch, klyosh shim va g‘arb attributida bo‘lgan har qanday tengqurlarini sazoyi qilgan. Hattoki, ularga jismoniy tahdid qilgan.

2/2

@CJandLP

Hattoki, bugungi kunda konsolidatsiyalashgan demokratiyalar ham McCarthyism paranoyasi kabi davrini o‘z boshidan kechirgan.

Reaksion o‘ng hukumatning anti-kommunist jazavasi akademik erkinlikni cheklab o‘tmagan. Universitetlar professorlari bilan bog‘liq sadoqat qasamyodi nizolarini yuzaga keltirgan.

@CJandLP