🎥 #NEW | Kashf and Karamāt — Between Two Extremes | Shaykh Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl حفظه الله | #AskAMJ

In this newly released audio Q&A, Shaykh Ahmad Jibrīl حفظه الله responds to a question regarding an Athar that is commonly used as proof by some deviants to allege Awliyā' having knowledge of the Ghayb, and he goes further to clarify the stance of Ahl As-Sunnah on Karāmāt, Kashf, and/or Firāsah. May Allāh سبحانه وتعالى protect and honor our Imām.

🔗 https://youtu.be/iFpl_yl5zE0

“…And if he threatened him with harm — whilst he is able to fulfill his threat — [and the harm is considered] intense harm, SUCH AS unaliving, or cutting off a limb, or intense physical abuse, or a long imprisonment or detainment, or the taking of alot of wealth (relative to the person), or being expelled from his lands or that which is similar to it, or the torture of his child by an authority, or being taken over by a thief or that which is similar to it, such that a person believes this threat is likely occur, and that likewise he’s unable to repel it or flee and disappear [such that the threat doesn’t affect him], then it is Ikrah…”

Similar quotes can be found in numerous books of Fiqh, by giants within each respective Madhhab.

Now the normal brain-dead response is to cite the context of which this quote was referenced within, but the context doesn’t matter since the point of emphasis in this citation, is the Scholars QUALIFICATION OF IKRAH. You’d think this is common sense, but alas, these rats aren’t working with a full deck of cards upstairs, قطع الله دابرهم.
‎
For those who dabbled in this nonsense and slander, then make clear your Tawbah and apologize to those whom you’ve falsely made Takfir of, lest Allah forgive you and guide you to that which is Pleasing to Him, سبحانه وتعالى.

والحمدلله رب العالمين

- Your Brother

DO THE MASHĀYIKH ALLOW TAHAKUM FOR “MONEY?”

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم، والصلاة والسلام على نبيه محمد، وبعد:

There has been a group of brain-dead kids who have been lingering in the shadows, like hungry rats — declaring Takfir of giants within this Deen, such as Shaykh Al-Islam, and likewise our contemporary Imams of Tawheed, like Shaykh Ahmad Musa Jibril حفظه الله تعالى, Shaykh Nasir Al-Fahd and Shaykh Ali Al-Khudayr فك الله بالعز أسرهم — by falsely claiming these Mashayikh allow unrestricted Tahākum to the Taghūt. Apart from this being a slanderous and baseless lie, for which they attempted to substantiate by citing Shaykh Ahmad not making Takfir of one who goes to the courts out of desire to save his children from shirk.

These heretic didn’t know, that this matter falls within the jurisdiction of “WHAT IKRAH IS,” not whether or not “TAHAKUM IS ALLOWED.” Due to their brain-dead status and likely cursed state, these rats can’t make this necessary distinction, and thereby unleash their filthy tongues on the Scholars of Haqq.

After they got refuted on the issue of Tahakum to save one’s kids from shirk, they backtracked and said, “Your Shaykh allows Tahakum for money! So he’s a Kafir!” Further exposing their brain-dead status. The Shaykh in the clip they’ve continuously circulated like crackheads, He حفظه الله تعالى clearly cites the reasoning of some of the Scholars, by saying “loss of wealth that’s DEVASTATING*,” meaning some
scholars excuse one under Ikrah, not “for money*.”

‎Here’s a teaching moment for anyone adhering to this brain-dead heretical cult:

What is deemed as “اكراه ملجئ” is differed upon amongst the scholars — meaning it goes back to Usūl Al-Fiqh. What اكراه ملجئ is, is a matter that is derived from Usūl Al-Fiqh, not Aqeedah. The Aqeedah portion of the matter, is that one isn’t excused from Shirk, UNLESS he’s under Ikrah, whilst his heart is firm with belief. Which the Shaykh has proved, not only by his clear belief which he’s consistently and continuously preaching, but with what he lives by — حفظه الله تعالى. So to spell it out plainly, no one but a Mushrik says you can desire to seek the judgement of the Taghut unrestrictedly. The point of contention is WHAT IKRAH IS, not whether or not Tahakum is allowed — so when these slanderous rats begin their slander with “Your Shaykh allows…” — know from the getgo they’re absolutely clueless and simply parroting nonsense and slander.

‎Thirdly, to prove the Shaykh was citing “DEVASTATING” loss of wealth within the context of Ikrah (apart from the clear context that’s conveniently clipped) is that he said if one does it, and I quote: “…if one’s heart is full of belief…”

‎Which corresponds directly to the Ayah:

‎An-Nahl 16:106

‎مَن كَفَرَ بِٱللَّهِ مِنۢ بَعۡدِ إِيمَٰنِهِۦٓ إِلَّا مَنۡ أُكۡرِهَ وَقَلۡبُهُۥ مُطۡمَئِنٌّۢ بِٱلۡإِيمَٰنِ وَلَٰكِن مَّن شَرَحَ بِٱلۡكُفۡرِ صَدۡرًا فَعَلَيۡهِمۡ غَضَبٌ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَلَهُمۡ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ

‎Whoever disbelieved in Allâh after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith; but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allâh, and theirs will be a great torment.

‎Some scholars did in fact consider a devastating loss of wealth as اكراه ملجئ, while others didn’t. No where in Islamic history did anyone make Takfir of those who took this opinion over the other — until of course this brain-dead cult appeared less then a decade ago. Unless these Zanadiqa believe that Tawheed was hidden and suddenly found in the slums of some European country by some donkey who can’t speak Arabic?

Just to give you an idea, the author of the famous Hanbali work زاد المستقنع, Al-Hajāwi رحمه الله said in another work [كتاب الإقناع في فقه الإمام أحمد بن حنبل 4/4]:

“…وإن هدده قادر بما يضره ضررا كثيرا كقتل وقطع طرف وضرب شديد وحبس وقيد طويلين وأخذ مال كثير وإخراج من ديار ونحوه أو بتعذيب ولده بسلطان أو تغلب كلص ونحوه يغلب على ظنه وقوع ما هدده به وعجزه عن دفعه والهرب منه والاختفاء فهو إكراه…”