In 1954, John Enders wrote a paper on cytopathogenic effects (CPE) in tissue cultures. In it, he stated that CPE can be caused by many "noxious agents," & the effect could not necessarily be considered a result of a "virus." He noted chemical elements & unknown factors as causes.

Enders admitted that CPE is influenced by factors known & unknown, including the age of the cell used, prior culturing conditions, & serial passaging. Environmental factors known (media composition, incubation temp, length of cultivation) & unknown can enhance or decrease CPE.

In other words, no "virus" is necessary as an explanation for the very effects claimed to be caused by "viruses" in the cell cultures that supposedly "prove" their existence within the culture. ?‍♂️

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13198118/

For some reason, simple logic is far too difficult for those defending virology. If you claim that pathogenic "viruses" exist & enter our bodies, highjack our cells, burst out replicating millions of copies, cause disease, & transmit person to person, it's your burden to prove.

To do so, you must provide the absolutely necessary evidence derived from the scientific method that should be found within any foundational paper that will prove the claim of the existence of any pathogenic "virus." Start with the evidence requested here. ?

Dr. Friedman confirmed the report, saying that Dr. Barrett "absolutely refused" to go through with the challenge as he was not from Wayne County. In the end, the cowardly excuse boiled down to "you aren't the right chiropractor from the right area." ?‍♂️

https://www.newspapers.com/image/689361545/?match=1&terms=barrett%20friedman%20germ%20duel